Achtung! Die Seite wird derzeit nicht aktualisiert. Die Inhalte sind im wesentlichen auf dem Stand 31.12.2011
Achtung! Die Seite wird derzeit nicht aktualisiert. Die Inhalte sind im wesentlichen auf dem Stand 31.12.2011
Pressemitteilung
C-287/11 P;
Verkündet am: 
 04.07.2013
EuGH Europäischer Gerichtshof
 

Rechtskräftig: unbekannt!
The Court dismisses the Commission’s appeal against the judgment of the General Court annulling the fines imposed on Aalberts, Aquatis and Simplex due to their participation in the cartel on the copper fittings market
Click here to the full text of the judgement

By decision of 20 September 20061, the European Commission imposed fines of a total amount of €314.76 million on 30 companies for having participated in a cartel in the copper fittings sector. It found in particular that Aalberts Industries NV, as a parent company, and its subsidiaries, Comap SA (formerly Aquatis France SAS) and Simplex Armaturen participated in that cartel between 25 June 2003 and 1 April 2004. The Commission imposed a fine of €100.8 million on Aalberts, €55.15 million of which was imposed jointly and severally with its subsidiaries, Aquatis and Simplex, and an additional fine imposed jointly and severally on each of those two companies.

The infringement consisted in fixing prices, agreeing on discounts and rebates, agreeing on implementation mechanisms for introducing price increases, allocating national markets, allocating customers and exchanging other commercial information and also in participating in regular meetings.

The undertakings turned to the General Court to seek, primarily, the annulment of the Commission Decision and, in the alternative, the reduction of their fines.

By judgment of 24 March 20112, the General Court took the view that the Commission had committed an error in regarding those undertakings as having participated in the cartel during the period between 25 June 2003 and 1 April 2004. The General Court annulled the Commission Decision and the fines imposed on the undertakings.

By its judgment delivered today, the Court of Justice dismisses the Commission’s appeal. Consequently, the General Court’s annulment of the fines stands.

Copper Fittings Cartel

Case number - Parties - Nationality - Fine imposed by the Commission - Decision of the General Court - Decision of the Court of Justice

C-276/11 P -- Viega v Commission -- DE -- €54.29 million -- T-375/06 Dismissal of the action -- Dismissal of the appeal

C-289/11 P -- Legris Industries v Commission -- FR -- €46.8 million -- T-376/06 Dismissal of the action - Dismissal of the appeal

C-290/11 P -- Comap v Commission -- FR -- €18.56 million -- T-377/06 Dismissal of the action -- Dismissal of the appeal

C-264/11 P -- Kaimer and Others v Commission -- DE, IT -- €7.97 million -- T-379/06 Reduction of the fine €7.15 million -- Dismissal of the appeal

C-286/11 P -- Commission v Tomkins -- UK -- €5.25 million -- T-382/06 Reduction of the fine €4.25 million -- Dismissal of the appeal

C-287/11 P -- Commission v Aalberts Industries and Others -- NL, FR, DE -- €100.8 million -- T-385/06 Annulment of the fine -- Dismissal of the appeal

--------------
NOTE: An appeal, on a point or points of law only, may be brought before the Court of Justice against a judgment or order of the General Court. In principle, the appeal does not have suspensive effect. If the appeal is admissible and well founded, the Court of Justice sets aside the judgment of the General Court. Where the state of the proceedings so permits, the Court of Justice may itself give final judgment in the case. Otherwise, it refers the case back to the General Court, which is bound by the decision given by the Court of Justice on the appeal.
---------------
1Commission Decision C(2006) 4180 of 20 September 2006 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/F 1/38.121 – Fittings).
2Case T-385/06 Aalberts Industries and Others v Commission, see Press Release No 24/11.
-----------------------------------------------------
Die von uns erfassten Urteile wurden oft anders formatiert als das Original. Dies bedeutet, daß Absätze eingefügt und Hervorhebungen durch fett-/kursiv-/&farbig-machen sowie Unterstreichungen vorgenommen wurden. Dies soll verdeutlichen, aber keinesfalls natürlich den Sinn verändern.Wenn Sie vorsichtshalber zusätzlich die Originalversion sehen möchten, hier ist der Link zur Quelle (kein Link? Dann ist dieser Link nicht in unserer DB gespeichert, z.B. weil das Urteil vor Frühjahr 2009 gespeichert worden ist).
       URTEILE GESETZE/VO KOMMENTARE VIDEOS ÜBER UNS IMPRESSUM